[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks.
From: |
Katsumi Yamaoka |
Subject: |
Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks. |
Date: |
Mon, 30 May 2005 15:45:54 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>>> In <address@hidden>
>>>>>> Lute Kamstra <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Other major mode in Gnus still use gnus-run-hooks which uses
>> run-hooks. Katsumi, could you fix those modes in a similar way?
>>>>> In <address@hidden> Katsumi Yamaoka wrote:
> Ok, I'll make time to do that, maybe in Monday.
>>>>> In <address@hidden> Richard Stallman wrote:
> Is it possible to use run-hooks in those Emacs versions?
> Gnus should define a function called gnus-run-mode-hooks, which calls
> run-mode-hooks if that is defined, otherwise run-hooks. Then all the
> modes in Gnus could use gnus-run-mode-hooks.
I've done it in the Gnus trunk and the v5-10 branch.
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., (continued)
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/26
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Juanma Barranquero, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/27
- RE: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Drew Adams, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Juanma Barranquero, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Lute Kamstra, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Miles Bader, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Katsumi Yamaoka, 2005/05/27
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks.,
Katsumi Yamaoka <=
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/31
- Re: run-hooks vs. run-mode-hooks., Richard Stallman, 2005/05/28