[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The MH-E repository
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: The MH-E repository |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:00:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> > Have they signed papers for MH-E only, or general past/future changes
> > for emacs as a whole?
>
> It seems to be a mixture right now.
>
> How, specifically, does that matter?
Maybe it doesn't, but...
If someone has write access to the emacs repository, but only has signed
papers for a (small) subset of the code, we need to make sure that person
doesn't change things outside the assignments.
To me, it seems simpler if people with write access have assigned
past/future changes to Emacs as a whole.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- Re: The MH-E repository, (continued)
Re: The MH-E repository, Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/31
Re: The MH-E repository, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/31