[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The MH-E repository
From: |
Peter S Galbraith |
Subject: |
Re: The MH-E repository |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:47:53 -0400 |
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> wrote:
> My two big questions are: 1) Is anyone against this, and why?
My only concern is having more people affected by broken code. I don't
know how Emacs developers works because I don't track their daily work,
so maybe this isn't a relevant issue...
Sometimes in the past, a MH-E developer would _try_ something, possibly
a new way of handling something. He would check the new code into CVS
and it might break the codebase a little while it was being finalized,
but it was checked in so other developers could try it out and give
feedback. I wouldn't feel comfortable doing this anymore knowing that
I'm affecting Emacs for a far greater number of users. I prefer that we
check in released version of MH-E that are known to work.
--
Peter S. Galbraith, MH-E developer <address@hidden>
GPG key 1024/D2A913A1 - 97CE 866F F579 96EE 6E68 8170 35FF 799E
6623'rd GNU/Linux user at the Counter - http://counter.li.org/
- Re: The MH-E repository, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/01
- Re: The MH-E repository,
Peter S Galbraith <=
- Re: The MH-E repository, Bill Wohler, 2005/06/01
- Re: The MH-E repository, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/02
- Re: The MH-E repository, Bill Wohler, 2005/06/02
- Re: The MH-E repository, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/03
- Re: The MH-E repository, Bill Wohler, 2005/06/03
- Re: [Savannah-help-public] Re: The MH-E repository, Sylvain Beucler, 2005/06/04
- Re: [Savannah-help-public] Re: The MH-E repository, Miles Bader, 2005/06/04
- Re: [Savannah-help-public] Re: The MH-E repository, Bill Wohler, 2005/06/04