Re: Threads in emacs implementation

[jhd]

> > The greatest obstacle to this seems to be shallow binding - you'd  
> > have
> > to unwind one thread's stack and rewind another's when switching
> > threads.  Maybe there's an easier way that I don't see...
>
> I don't see why this subject keeps coming up.
>
> We don't need threads in elisp. Just more asynchronous network
> implementations.
>
> Anyway, async code is so much more fun to write than threaded
> code. Threads are for beginners.

Async network code won't take advantage of multiple CPU:s.  Threads do.

    Jan D.