[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Threads in emacs implementation
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Threads in emacs implementation |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Jun 2005 08:18:19 -0400 |
I think an alternate solution is to have no shared variables between
threads once they are forked, and communicate through standard IPC
(pipes, semaphores, etc.).
This is not possible with shallow binding. All Lisp programs
use the same set of symbols, and each symbol has a value.
Many symbols' values have important standard meanings.
Re: Threads in emacs implementation, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/09
- Re: Threads in emacs implementation, Ted Zlatanov, 2005/06/10
- Re: Threads in emacs implementation, Masatake YAMATO, 2005/06/11
- Re: Threads in emacs implementation,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Threads in emacs implementation, Ted Zlatanov, 2005/06/15
- Re: Threads in emacs implementation, Miles Bader, 2005/06/15
- Re: Threads in emacs implementation, Ted Zlatanov, 2005/06/16
- Re: Threads in emacs implementation, Miles Bader, 2005/06/16
- Re: Threads in emacs implementation, Ted Zlatanov, 2005/06/17
- Re: Threads in emacs implementation, Richard Stallman, 2005/06/17
- Re: Threads in emacs implementation, Ted Zlatanov, 2005/06/20
- Re: Threads in emacs implementation, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/21
- Re: Threads in emacs implementation, Nic Ferrier, 2005/06/21
- Re: Threads in emacs implementation, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/22