[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 12:55:04 +0200 |
> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:52:06 +0200
> From: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> On 6/12/05, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Anyway, I'm still confused. Assuming that I checkout a file with -kb,
> > and that file is not recorded as binary in the repository, would
> > commands such as "cvs diff", "cvs annotate", etc. work exactly as when
> > no -kb was ever used on that file?
>
> cvs diff, annotate, etc. do work as if the files weren't checked out with -kb.
Thanks for the footwork. I've now removed the warning from
nt/INSTALL.
> > Finally, if "co -kb" indeed has only a local effect, and none of the
> > other commands, like ci, diff, up -j, etc. are affected, it sounds
> > like Windows users should be told to checkout the whole tree with -kb,
> > right?
>
> Not sure if they should be told to, but at least there is no problem
> if they do: I just checked out a -kb tree and built it with MSVC with
> no problem whatsoever.
I did that as well (but with MinGW). I will run with this setup for a
while and see if I encounter any problems.
Re: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/11