Re: lists.texi

[Juri Linkov]

> Apparently these timings are not very fixed.  In a freshly started
> Emacs, my proposed version took 12 seconds (instead of earlier 23) and
> the abstract versions 40 seconds (instead of 51).  This gives a
> mysterious gain of 11 seconds for both.  But now my proposed version
> runs 3.33 times faster than the abstract ones, instead of earlier 2.2.

I noticed too that in sufficiently long Emacs sessions Lisp evaluation
slows down.

-- 
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/