[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:18:17 +0200 |
> C-h f complete-in-turn RET
Oops, sorry. As you casually said "the complete-in-turn thingy" I
(erroneously) assumed you were describing something, not giving the
precise name of the function :-)
Anyway, I've implemented the change to `set-variable' without it. You
seem to want the two-phase completion, and Richard seems not to (at
least that's how I interpreted his comments). So let's first decide
how we want `set-variable' to behave.
--
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, (continued)
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/28
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/28
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/28
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/28
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Juanma Barranquero, 2005/06/28
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/29
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/29
- Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/27