Re: defcustom for exec-path - is the type correct?

[Lennart Borgman]

Richard M. Stallman wrote:

>    I just did M-x customize-option RET exec-path RET.
>
>    I think the type for exec-path looks wrong. What do you think?
>
> It looks right to me.
>
> When you report a problem, please describe what aspect of the
> behavior you think is wrong.  This is important so that we
> don't have to just scratch our heads, wondering whether we
> see the problem or not.
>  
Looking at it again I understand. Yes, it seems correct except for that 
"file" should be "directory".