Re: Is there any way to have a string literal that is read "raw"

[Lennart Borgman]

Richard M. Stallman wrote:

> This does not alter the point that Windows-only improvements are not
> important for the GNU Project.  Correcting Windows-only bugs or
> misfeatures is welcome, just not as important as making Emacs better
> on the GNU system.  Windows-only features are not acceptable.
>  
Why?

This is just a strategic choice and as such I do think it needs an 
explanation. It is not the goal. But even though I say this now I would 
like to leave the discussion until  after the release.