[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is there any way to have a string literal that is read "raw"
|
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Is there any way to have a string literal that is read "raw" |
|
Date: |
Mon, 11 Jul 2005 01:35:30 -0400 |
> However, it won't fit in Emacs Lisp, because it can't be parsed
> backwards.
Yes, but there are 4HclubH4s for every taste.
Alas, that won't help, because symbols can end in `H4'.
Imagine trying to
explain that design decision to someone in 10 years...
Since I made that design decision 20 years ago, why would 10 more
years make it hard to explain?
- Re: Is there any way to have a string literal that is read "raw", (continued)
- Re: Is there any way to have a string literal that is read "raw", Sean O'Rourke, 2005/07/09
- Re: Is there any way to have a string literal that is read "raw", Markus Gritsch, 2005/07/09
- Re: Is there any way to have a string literal that is read "raw", David Kastrup, 2005/07/09
- Re: Is there any way to have a string literal that is read "raw", Lennart Borgman, 2005/07/09
- Re: Is there any way to have a string literal that is read "raw", David Kastrup, 2005/07/09
- Re: Is there any way to have a string literal that is read "raw", Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/10
- Re: Is there any way to have a string literal that is read "raw", Sean O'Rourke, 2005/07/10
- Re: Is there any way to have a string literal that is read "raw", David Kastrup, 2005/07/10
- Re: Is there any way to have a string literal that is read "raw",
Richard M. Stallman <=