Re: Strange change in bytecmop.el

[Stefan Monnier]

>     the last part not only is strange because (featurep 'emacs) is never used
>     (since Emacs does not provide the `emacs' feature)

> I didn't realize that at the time, but maybe we should add it.

Why bother.  People already use (featurep 'xemacs) in order to check whether
they're running on Emacs or XEmacs.  So (featurep 'emacs) would be redundant.

>                                                      but also because it tries
>     to handle (featurep 'xemacs) even though that's already handled in
>     byteopt.el where we do:

> Well, it didn't always do the job.
> This code is needed.

Could you give at least some example so we can add relevant comments
explaining the apparent redundancy?


        Stefan