Re: FRAME_PTR vs "struct frame *"

[Miles Bader]

2005/7/29, Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>:
> The FRAME_PTR macro seems not too successful: there are ~1300 uses of
> "struct frame *" on 39 files, vs. ~270 uses of FRAME_PTR on 30 files.
> 
> Should this be unified, eventually?

It seems completely pointless to have an obfuscating macro (ok it's
actually a typedef) like FRAME_PTR.  It's very old, though so maybe
there was some reason a long time ago...

I'd say, get rid of it.

-Miles
-- 
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.