[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another Emacs icon
From: |
Robert J. Chassell |
Subject: |
Re: Another Emacs icon |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:23:52 +0000 (UTC) |
The reason why using "M-x" does not appeal to me
is that I don't think of that as the central
feature of Emacs. ...
Indeed, "M-x" is designed for commands that do not have a short key
sequence. It is for commands that are `left over' from frequent use.
I know I use a control command, like C-b, and a meta command, such as
M-f, much more frequently.
Indeed, when a command I use frequently does not have a shorter
keybinding already, I tend to bind it myself. For example, I bound
`comment-out' to C-c ;
Not only is "M-x" misleading as an image, it is dangerous, since it
might lead a few novices to think that "M-x" should be used more often
than need be.
At least, with the image of a Gnu head, no novice is going to think
that Emacs is a Gnu, although they might wonder about the connection
between GNU Emacs and an operating system with a Linux kernel.
--
Robert J. Chassell
address@hidden GnuPG Key ID: 004B4AC8
http://www.rattlesnake.com http://www.teak.cc
- Re: Another Emacs icon, (continued)
- Re: Another Emacs icon, Stefan Monnier, 2005/10/07
- Re: Another Emacs icon, Lennart Borgman, 2005/10/07
- Re: Another Emacs icon, Juri Linkov, 2005/10/07
- Re: Another Emacs icon, Lennart Borgman, 2005/10/07
- Re: Another Emacs icon, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/08
- Re: Another Emacs icon, Lennart Borgman, 2005/10/08
- Re: Another Emacs icon, Chong Yidong, 2005/10/08
- Re: Another Emacs icon, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/10
- Re: Another Emacs icon,
Robert J. Chassell <=
- Re: Another Emacs icon, David Kastrup, 2005/10/10
- Re: Another Emacs icon, Lennart Borgman, 2005/10/10
- Re: Another Emacs icon, Robert J. Chassell, 2005/10/10
Re: Another Emacs icon, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/10/08
Re: Another Emacs icon, Mathias Dahl, 2005/10/10