Re: image size limit?

[Richard M. Stallman]

    > But I don't think this limit should be absolute.  I think it should be
    > specified as a multiple of the frame height and width, and it should
    > be given as a floating point number.  I'd suggest 2.0 as the default
    > for this ratio.

    What frame should we then use? The selected frame?

The frame that the image is to be displayed in.

    That's not really logical, the frame that issues the call to load an
    image (which is where we check the image size) may not be the frame
    that ends up displaying it.

How could they be different?