Re: po file charset via auto-coding-functions

[Stefan Monnier]

> If this means passing "/home/handa/x.tgz!vi.po" as the second argument
> to find-operation-coding-system, I think it is not clean.  That
> argument is documented to be _the same_ in meaning as the argument you
> would pass to OPERATION, but this string isn't the same, isn't a valid
> argument to insert-file-contents.

IIUC currently the argument passed is "vi.po" but that is not the argument
passed to operation either.  So passing "/home/handa/x.tgz!vi.po" instead
won't make it any worse.  As a matter of fact I think passing
"/home/handa/x.tgz!vi.po" is more correct: if we assume that
a suitable file-name-handler is installed it's perfectly correct.


        Stefan