Re: C-x C-f RET change

[David Kastrup]

"Drew Adams" <address@hidden> writes:

>     > I use pop-up-frames = t. Each buffer is in its own frame, by
>     > default. So, I use `C-x 4 f' to open the same file in another
>     > frame (cloning the frame, in effect).
>
>     What's wrong with `C-x 5 2'?
>
> Nothing.  Good point.
>
> I guess I never think of the `C-x 5' prefix, because I use pop-up-frames =
> t. `C-x 4' generally does the same thing as `C-x 5' in that case, except for
> a few exceptions like this (there is no `C-x 4 2').

There is C-x 2 though.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum