[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: address@hidden:RE:weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation]
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: address@hidden:RE:weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation] |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:29:32 -0800 |
[ad-default-compilation-action]
> The default value is `maybe', and that's the value I had. The doc
> string says that that means that activation will also compile - if
> the byte-compiler is already loaded. I have no idea what loads the
> byte compiler, or why its being loaded would be the criterion
> applied here, but I must assume that in my case it was already
> loaded, and that that is the default situation (?).
The byte-compiler is not loaded by default. The (defadvice ...
(... compile)...) in bar.el makes the difference.
So, the presence of `compile' in one defadvice turns on byte-compilation for
subsequent defadvices - IOW, it's modal? I don't see that explained
anywhere.
> But I guess the `compile' FLAG for defadvice acts like the COMPILE
> arg to ad-activate in this regard (not mentioned in the doc string).
> Is that correct?
It seems so.
Does that COMPILE arg also turn on a byte-compilation mode that stays on
until turned off? That too is not documented, AFAICT.
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bug withbyte-compilation], (continued)
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bug withbyte-compilation], Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/12
- RE: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bugwithbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/12
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bugwithbyte-compilation], Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/12
- RE: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/12
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/13
- RE: address@hidden: RE: weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/13
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Johan Bockgård, 2005/12/13
- RE: address@hidden: RE:weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/13
- RE: address@hidden:RE:weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/13
- Re: address@hidden: RE:weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Johan Bockgård, 2005/12/14
- RE: address@hidden:RE:weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation],
Drew Adams <=
- Re: address@hidden:RE:weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Johan Bockgård, 2005/12/14
- RE: address@hidden:RE:weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/14
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bug with byte-compilation], Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/11
- RE: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bug withbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/11
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bug withbyte-compilation], Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/12
- RE: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvice bugwithbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/12
- RE: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/12
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weird defadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/12
- RE: address@hidden: RE: weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Drew Adams, 2005/12/12
- Re: address@hidden: RE: weirddefadvicebugwithbyte-compilation], Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/12