Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> writes:
Kim F. Storm wrote:
Lennart Borgman <address@hidden> writes:
IMO a sexp is better since it is more flexible.
Really? Can you please be more specific.
What type of event cannot be expressed via the kbd macro?
I do not know. That was not what I meant. I just meant that a string
can be entered like for example "\C-g" when you use :type 'sexp.
With my suggestion, you just write C-g -- much simpler and equally flexible.
A user must know a lot about internal representation -- with my suggestion,
he just has to do C-h c to learn how to write the keys he's interested in
and copy the output directly to the field.