[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Docstring line length
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Docstring line length |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Dec 2005 16:20:11 -0800 |
The reason given for 67 for the first line was apparently
its appearance in *Apropos*. I don't see the point of this.
The doc string is prepended by 11 or 12 characters in any
case (e.g. " Variable: "), so presumably the
guideline for other lines than the first should then be
67+12=79, not 60.
You apparently resize your frames to fit the buffer. But most people
use fixed 80 column frames. Hence, the desirability for lines to be
strictly less than 80 characters.
Yes, I do.
I'm sure most people do not do as I do, but I'm not sure that most people
use fixed 80-char frames. Do we have any user data to go on?
In any case, I also want the lines to be strictly less than 80 chars. I
proposed 70.
- Docstring line length, Bill Wohler, 2005/12/20
- Re: Docstring line length, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/20
- RE: Docstring line length, Drew Adams, 2005/12/20
- Re: Docstring line length, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/20
- RE: Docstring line length,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Docstring line length, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/20
- RE: Docstring line length, Drew Adams, 2005/12/20
- Re: Docstring line length, Henrik Enberg, 2005/12/21
- Re: Docstring line length, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/21
- RE: Docstring line length, Drew Adams, 2005/12/21
- Re: Docstring line length, Lennart Borgman, 2005/12/21
- Re: Docstring line length, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/22
- Legal papers for Emacs contributions (was: Re: Docstring line length), Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/12/22
- Re: Legal papers for Emacs contributions (was: Re: Docstring line length), Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/22
- Re: Legal papers for Emacs contributions (was: Re: Docstring line length), Giorgos Keramidas, 2005/12/22