[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Docstring line length
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Docstring line length |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Dec 2005 20:57:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>> Since TTYs have been 80 characters for decades, it is the best
>> standard. Indeed, the only standard.
>
> There are also issues of legibility which make it undesirable to use lines
> longer than 80 chars unless a significant portion is devoted to whitepspace
> (e.g. indentation, but note that excessive indentation usually leads to
> unreadable code and it's then preferable to extract the inner code into its
> own function).
Remember that the original punch card design (where the 80 is from)
had 6 columns in front and 8 in the back for different purposes,
making for a total of 66 material columns, which is rather close to
what book designers recommend as a good line length for a human
reader.
Whatever. Let's move on.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- link appearance (again) (was: RE: Docstring line length), (continued)
- Re: Docstring line length, Johan Bockgård, 2005/12/20
- Re: Docstring line length, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/20
- Re: Docstring line length, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/20
- Re: Docstring line length, Bill Wohler, 2005/12/21
- RE: Docstring line length, Drew Adams, 2005/12/21
- Re: Docstring line length, Stefan Monnier, 2005/12/21
- Re: Docstring line length,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Docstring line length, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/21
Re: Docstring line length, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/21