[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Starnge comment in Custom Theme code.
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Starnge comment in Custom Theme code. |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Dec 2005 12:02:52 -0600 (CST) |
Chong Yidong wrote:
I don't know where "we" decided that, but I wrote that part at
Richard's request.
The "we" refers to a discussion several months ago on Emacs devel. I
believe to remember that Richard then decided that themes should not
override a non-Custom set value. I could try to find this back in the
archives to be sure that I do not misremember, but if Richard changed
his mind anyway, this is irrelevant. It is logical to not override a
non-Custom set value, because the user theme is never overridden.
A non-Custom set value is either set by the user, through an explicit
setq or by, say, enabling or disabling a minor mode, or by code that
_needs_ that particular value. In neither case should a theme
override that. Doing so would cause trouble.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Starnge comment in Custom Theme code., Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/24
- Re: Starnge comment in Custom Theme code., Chong Yidong, 2005/12/24
- Re: Starnge comment in Custom Theme code.,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: Starnge comment in Custom Theme code., Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/24
- Re: Starnge comment in Custom Theme code., Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/24
- Re: Starnge comment in Custom Theme code., Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/25
- Re: Starnge comment in Custom Theme code., Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/25
- Re: Starnge comment in Custom Theme code., Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/26
- Re: Starnge comment in Custom Theme code., Luc Teirlinck, 2005/12/26