Re: Emacs antialiasing in X

[David Abrahams]

Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes:

> 2006/1/18, David Abrahams <address@hidden>:
>> > I've attached a diff from HEAD 2006-01-12 10:24 to the XFT branch (the
>> > latest sync with head occurred then).  It is not that much.
>>
>> I could easily(?) apply this patch to emacs-unicode-2 myself, but I
>> don't want to duplicate work if Miles is going to do it too.  So,
>> Miles, what'll it be?
>
> My only concern is if any branch merging is done.
>
> If you want to apply this patch directly on the emacs-unicode-2
> branch, and work there, then I've no reason to be involved (I dunno
> whether that's acceptable to Kenichi et al though).

I guess I would be slightly more comfortable if someone with more
experience with the emacs codebase (like you) wanted to merge the two
branches together.  It seems like a lot to ask, but you did volunteer
:).  However, it sounds like it's a small thing so if you want to back
out, I can probably manage.

> If you want to work on a new branch (derived from emacs-unicode-2),
> and later merge it into emacs-unicode-2, then I'd like to be the one
> that creates the new branch (and later merges it back into
> emacs-unicode-2).
>
> So if it's the latter, give me the word, and I'll make a new
> branch. 

Well, that would keep me out of everyone's hair -- if someone will
give me commit privileges, that is.  Who do I ask?  Otherwise I'll
have to ask somebody to keep committing my intermediate work.

> [Actually, probably the simplest thing to do is for me to make it a
> clone of emacs-unicode-2, and let you apply Jan's patch.]

Won't that make *more* work when things are integrated?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com