[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Risky local variable mechanism
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Risky local variable mechanism |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:18:11 -0600 (CST) |
Chong Yidong wrote:
Sorry, you're just being a drama queen here. The variable in question
is a whitelist of safe variables.
Really? You apparently do not know what your own patch does. It
makes a defcustom out of `ignored-local-variables'. This is _not_ a
whitelist of safe variables, quite to the contrary.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, (continued)
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Kim F. Storm, 2006/02/02
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/03
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/03
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/05
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/06
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/07
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/06
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/07
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/07
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/07
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/07
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/07
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/07
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/07
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/08
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Stefan Monnier, 2006/02/08