[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: faq.texi
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: faq.texi |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:41:43 +0200 |
> From: Juri Linkov <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 19:31:44 +0200
>
> > I was talking about binding S-insert to do the same thing as C-y.
> > Is there a problem doing that?
>
> Do you mean the same thing as C-y does in isearch mode or not?
The same as C-y does in isearch.
> If you mean binding S-insert to the same thing as C-y in isearch mode
> (i.e. `isearch-yank-line') then I think it is a bad idea to bind a useful
> key S-insert to `isearch-yank-line' just for consistency. Moreover,
> I think C-y was a bad choice for a keybinding to `isearch-yank-line'.
Well, if you oppose to the C-y binding in isearch, then I think you
should disqualify yourself from arguing about an identical binding for
S-insert, since it's clear that you will dislike them both on the same
grounds. I suggested the S-insert binding for consistency.
- Re: faq.texi, (continued)
- Re: faq.texi, Romain Francoise, 2006/02/06
- Re: faq.texi, Frank Schmitt, 2006/02/07
- Re: faq.texi, Romain Francoise, 2006/02/07
- Re: faq.texi, Kevin Rodgers, 2006/02/07
- Re: faq.texi, Frank Schmitt, 2006/02/07
- Re: faq.texi, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/08
- Re: faq.texi, Romain Francoise, 2006/02/08
- Re: faq.texi, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/08
- Re: faq.texi, Romain Francoise, 2006/02/08
- Re: faq.texi, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/09
- Re: faq.texi,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: faq.texi, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/09
- Re: faq.texi, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/09
- Re: faq.texi, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/09
- Re: faq.texi, Miles Bader, 2006/02/09
- Re: faq.texi, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/10
- Re: faq.texi, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/14
- Re: faq.texi, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/14
- Re: faq.texi, Miles Bader, 2006/02/14
- Re: faq.texi, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/02/15
- RE: faq.texi, Drew Adams, 2006/02/15