[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: faq.texi
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: faq.texi |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:07:30 +0200 |
> From: Juri Linkov <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 23:48:34 +0200
>
> > Well, if you oppose to the C-y binding in isearch, then I think you
> > should disqualify yourself from arguing about an identical binding for
> > S-insert, since it's clear that you will dislike them both on the same
> > grounds. I suggested the S-insert binding for consistency.
>
> There is no inconsistency in my wishes. I wish:
>
> - one key to bind to isearch-yank-line (not C-y)
> - one key to exit isearch and yank (S-insert)
Yeah, like I said: you ``consistently'' dislike both C-y and S-Ins in
this context. By contrast, what I said is if C-y does something,
S-Ins should do the same.
- Re: faq.texi, (continued)
- Re: faq.texi, Romain Francoise, 2006/02/07
- Re: faq.texi, Kevin Rodgers, 2006/02/07
- Re: faq.texi, Frank Schmitt, 2006/02/07
- Re: faq.texi, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/08
- Re: faq.texi, Romain Francoise, 2006/02/08
- Re: faq.texi, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/08
- Re: faq.texi, Romain Francoise, 2006/02/08
- Re: faq.texi, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/09
- Re: faq.texi, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/09
- Re: faq.texi, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/09
- Re: faq.texi,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: faq.texi, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/09
- Re: faq.texi, Miles Bader, 2006/02/09
- Re: faq.texi, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/10
- Re: faq.texi, Juri Linkov, 2006/02/14
- Re: faq.texi, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/14
- Re: faq.texi, Miles Bader, 2006/02/14
- Re: faq.texi, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/02/15
- RE: faq.texi, Drew Adams, 2006/02/15
- RE: faq.texi, Alan Mackenzie, 2006/02/15
- Re: faq.texi, Miles Bader, 2006/02/15