[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Copyright years
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Copyright years |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:52:11 +0200 |
> Cc: address@hidden
> From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden>
> Date: 09 Feb 2006 19:05:44 -0500
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > IANAL, so if these instructions are changed, I won't mind. I just
> > want them to be clear and unequivocal, and uniform across all the
> > packages that are part of the GNU project.
>
> emacs and its maintenance regimen precede GNU, so it is not surprising
> that there is policy discrepency.
Did you see this bit in standards.texi?
@title GNU Coding Standards
@author Richard Stallman, et al.
Richard is the maintainer of standards.texi, so I see no place for
discrepancy, only for some oversight.
- Re: Copyright years, (continued)
- Re: Copyright years, Mathias Dahl, 2006/02/05
- Re: Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/06
- Re: Copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Miles Bader, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, David Kastrup, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Lennart Borgman, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Copyright years, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/11
- Re: Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/11
- Re: Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/09
- Re: Copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/02/10
- Re: Copyright years, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/11