[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Risky local variable mechanism
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Risky local variable mechanism |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:11:46 -0600 (CST) |
Chong Yidong wrote:
> Also, before your patch, with `enable-local-variables' set to t, I
> could always take a look at the _entire_ local variables list, even for
> variables that Emacs deems safe, before enabling those variables.
> After your patch, this is apparently no longer an option.
No idea what you're referring --- are you referring to ignored
variables?
Now I see that in certain situations it does ask me. Did you make
`coding' the only exception? When visiting lisp/Changelog, I get
asked no questions (with `enable-local-variables' set to 'query), even
though lisp/Changelog has a local variables list.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, (continued)
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/11
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/02/14
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/13
- safe-local-variable additions (was: Risky local variable mechanism), Reiner Steib, 2006/02/16
- Re: safe-local-variable additions, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/16
- Re: safe-local-variable additions, Reiner Steib, 2006/02/17
Re: Risky local variable mechanism, LENNART BORGMAN, 2006/02/02
re: risky local variable mechanism, Jonathan Yavner, 2006/02/10