[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: safe-local-variable additions
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: safe-local-variable additions |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:47:51 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Reiner Steib <address@hidden> writes:
> `truncate-lines' could be added. Any objection against adding it?
> + (truncate-lines . t)
Sure, go ahead.
> `ispell-check-comments' and `ispell-local-dictionary' should also be
> added, IMHO.
>
> Is it better to put them in `files.el' or add it to `ispell.el' right
> after the corresponding `defcustom'?
Yes, safety declarations for minor mode variables should probably go
into files.el, since otherwise Emacs wouldn't know about them unless
the minor mode is loaded. (Safety declarations for major mode
variables can go into their own files, since those are loaded before
the file variables are processed.)
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, (continued)
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/02/13
- Re: Risky local variable mechanism, Chong Yidong, 2006/02/13
- safe-local-variable additions (was: Risky local variable mechanism), Reiner Steib, 2006/02/16
- Re: safe-local-variable additions,
Chong Yidong <=
- Re: safe-local-variable additions, Reiner Steib, 2006/02/17
Re: Risky local variable mechanism, LENNART BORGMAN, 2006/02/02
re: risky local variable mechanism, Jonathan Yavner, 2006/02/10