[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ECB
From: |
klaus.berndl |
Subject: |
RE: ECB |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Mar 2006 18:01:43 +0100 |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> But for now: Are there some work-arounds possible how to exclude some
>> windows from being "balanced" (means ajusted) by the new
>> balance-window? In the old one an advice for `walk-windows' was
>> enough which simply does not walk through these special windows...
>> But now, `walk-windows' is not used but `window-tree'...
>
> balance-windows should obey `window-size-fixed'. I don't know
> whether it does, and neither do I know whether ECB can use it.
Ah, very interesting - supposed balance-windos obeys window-sized-fixed
then ECB could advice `balance-window' and setting window-sized-fix to t
temporally
for the buffers displayed by the special ECB-windows (which should be ignored
for
balancing)...
Is not a generall solution for such problems (i mentioned in my posting) but
sounds
like a promising workaround for making newest balance-windows compatible with
ECB...
Thanks!
Ciao,
Klaus
>
>
> Stefan
- RE: ECB, klaus.berndl, 2006/03/07
- Re: ECB, Stefan Monnier, 2006/03/07
- Re: ECB, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/07
- RE: ECB,
klaus.berndl <=
- Re: ECB, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/07
- RE: ECB, klaus.berndl, 2006/03/08
- Re: ECB, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/09
- RE: ECB, klaus.berndl, 2006/03/08
- Re: ECB, Stefan Monnier, 2006/03/08
- Re: ECB, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/03/08
- Re: ECB, Stefan Monnier, 2006/03/09
- Re: ECB, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/03/09