[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:57:55 -0600 (CST) |
Chong Yidong wrote:
Note that allowing saves for risky local variables is practically
equivalent to eliminating the concept of risky local variables. If
Emacs allows saves for any variable not considered safe, the
`risky-local-variable' property has no special effect (as far as the
loading of local variables is concerned).
I believe that Richard decided that _every_ variable should be
considered risky, except when explicitly marked safe. It would seem
that this new concept of riskiness supersedes the old one and renders
it obsolete.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values, Andrew M. Scott, 2006/03/08
- Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values, Chong Yidong, 2006/03/08
- Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values, Andrew M. Scott, 2006/03/08
- Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values, Chong Yidong, 2006/03/08
- Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values, Andrew M. Scott, 2006/03/08
- Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values, Chong Yidong, 2006/03/08
- Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values, Kim F. Storm, 2006/03/09
- Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values, Chong Yidong, 2006/03/09
- Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/11
- Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values, Kim F. Storm, 2006/03/11
Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/09
Re: Clarification on using safe-local-variable-values, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/09