[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: defcustom :version
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: defcustom :version |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:08:04 -0800 |
> Here's an idea. customize-changed could work like customize-browse,
> except that it would show only the groups that cover settings which
> have changed meanings. What do you think?
I like it, with one caveat.
As I browsed the output of customized-changed, a couple of variables
caught my eye that I would have missed if they were hidden in a tree
structure. However, that concern would be mitigated with an Expand All
button (with a corresponding Collapse All button).
I have not been following this thread closely. However, if the question is
about changing the behavior of `customize-changed' now (before the release),
then I am against it.
I don't want to hear (or to miss) "Here's an idea" proposals about the
Customize design now, unless it's to discuss changes that might occur
_after_ the release.
In particular, if the idea is to have `customize-changed' not show every
single change, or to enclose the changes within a tree structure of groups,
then I am against it at the present time. If some such abbreviation is
(also) useful sometimes, then we can create a new command to do that. But
why do even that before the release?
We need a real discussion or two or three about Customize after the release.
Please, let's not make changes to the Customize design now.
Apologies if I misunderstood the question. I have not followed this thread.
If this is about fixing a bug, then please try to find a way to do that
without changing the design.
- Re: defcustom :version, (continued)
Re: defcustom :version, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/12
- Re: defcustom :version, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/12
- Re: defcustom :version, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/12
- Re: defcustom :version, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/13
- Re: defcustom :version, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/13
- Re: defcustom :version, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/14
- Re: defcustom :version, Bill Wohler, 2006/03/14
- RE: defcustom :version,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: defcustom :version, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/15
Re: defcustom :version, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/15
Re: defcustom :version, Bill Wohler, 2006/03/15
Re: defcustom :version, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/14
Re: defcustom :version, Bill Wohler, 2006/03/14
Re: defcustom :version, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/14
Re: defcustom :version, Bill Wohler, 2006/03/14
Re: defcustom :version, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/17
Re: defcustom :version, Richard Stallman, 2006/03/15
Re: defcustom :version, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/03/11