Re: address@hidden: RE: file-cache doc should state that thecache is non-persistent]

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: "Drew Adams" <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 07:32:11 -0800
> 
>     Btw, should we merge the "File Name Cache" section with the following
>     one, "File Convenience"?  They are both short, and the file cache is
>     certainly a convenience feature of the kind described in the latter
>     section.
> 
> No, I don't think that's a very good idea. File Name Cache is a reasonable,
> self-contained topic. File Convenience is, currently, a grab-bag or
> catch-all.

There's nothing wrong with a grab-bag section describing a feature
that has several commands.