Re: cl-byte-compile-compiler-macro

[Richard Stallman]

    > When I compile quux.el, does that need CL to be loaded?
    > (Assume quux.el does not load CL itself.)

    I think it does, since the accessor function has a byte-compile property
    that points to function in cl-macs (cl-byte-compile-compiler-macro).

I think it should be possible to compile quux.el without loading CL.

I proposed moving that function and its subroutine to subr.el.
Will that achieve the goal?