Re: meta-{next, previous}-error

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:

> Level Command             Implemented?
>
> -M    meta-previous-error N (e.g. diff-file-prev)
> -1    previous-error      Y
> +1    next-error          Y
> +M    meta-next-error     N (e.g. diff-file-next)
>
> (remember that *-error map to *-locus and *-match, so it's not only
> about errors)

It makes sense to me.

Now, `next-error' and `previous-error' are bound to `M-g n' and `M-g
p', as well as `M-g M-n' and `M-g M-p', so how about `M-g M-f' and
`M-g M-b' for the "higher level" commands?  (Forwards, backward.)
`M-g M-f' is quote easy to type...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  address@hidden * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen