[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-Xtra
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-Xtra |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Apr 2006 23:20:16 -0400 |
The stuff about VC that's in the Emacs manual is there because it is
important enough that we should keep it in the printed manual. At
least, I think it's that important; that's why I decided to keep it
there.
1) VC has its own manual like PCL-CVS does.
That would be no good because this would be missing from the printed
manual.
2) All the programming/development topics are moved to a separate manual
(Emacs IDE?) and only the obscure stuff is left in emacs-Xtra.
If this means splitting the Emacs Manual into two manuals, both of which
we would print, maybe that is a good idea--but how would we split it?
(Version control is not used solely for editing programs, so including
VC in a manual for "editing programs with Emacs" would not be right.)
- emacs-Xtra, Nick Roberts, 2006/04/12
- Re: emacs-Xtra,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Nick Roberts, 2006/04/13
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Nic, 2006/04/13
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/13
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/14
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Nic, 2006/04/14
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/15
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Ted Zlatanov, 2006/04/13
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/14
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Ted Zlatanov, 2006/04/14
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/14