[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-Xtra
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-Xtra |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Apr 2006 16:14:26 +1200 |
> 2) All the programming/development topics are moved to a separate manual
> (Emacs IDE?) and only the obscure stuff is left in emacs-Xtra.
>
> If this means splitting the Emacs Manual into two manuals, both of which
> we would print, maybe that is a good idea--but how would we split it?
In such a way that that fairly self contained topics like VC stay together.
You declined to say how much smaller the Emacs Manual needs to be, but I would
keep as much in it as possible.
Without this information, I would guess that the Avanced Features section could
be Volume Two and everything before, and everything after (Recovery from
Problems), could be Volume One.
> (Version control is not used solely for editing programs, so including
> VC in a manual for "editing programs with Emacs" would not be right.)
Emacs User Manaual Vol 1: Basics
Emacs User Manaual Vol 2: Advanced Features
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
- emacs-Xtra, Nick Roberts, 2006/04/12
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/12
- Re: emacs-Xtra,
Nick Roberts <=
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Nic, 2006/04/13
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/13
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/14
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Nic, 2006/04/14
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/15
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Ted Zlatanov, 2006/04/13
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/14
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Ted Zlatanov, 2006/04/14
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/14
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Ted Zlatanov, 2006/04/14