[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-Xtra
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-Xtra |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Apr 2006 10:35:39 +0300 |
> From: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
> Cc: Nick Roberts <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:40:20 -0400
>
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> >> I think the all the documentation for VC should be in one manual.
> >
> > I agree. And the same goes for Calendar.
>
> Just to comment that the Calendar manual has never (AFAIK) been in one
> place.
The fact that this problem always existed doesn't mean we shouldn't
try to fix it.
> So putting it all in the main manual (since it's already been
> established previously that it should not all be removed from there)
> would mean that the introduction of emacs-xtra would have the effect
> of _increasing_ the size of the main manual in this area, the opposite
> of the intent.
The intent is to make the _printed_ manual smaller (because this makes
FSF's publishing costs higher). The on-line version's size matters
much less, especially since we now compress it at "make install" time.
- Re: emacs doc changes, (continued)
- Re: emacs doc changes, Ted Zlatanov, 2006/04/19
- Re: emacs doc changes, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/25
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/15
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/14
- Re: emacs-Xtra, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/14
Re: emacs-Xtra, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/13