[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Apr 2006 12:15:07 -0400 |
As can be seen in "cperl-version", I've currently updated the code only upto
version 5.0, even though I have imported upto version 5.10 on the
vendor branch.
Thank you--I didn't know this was being done.
So, how well does our current Cperl mode work?
Should it be the default?
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), (continued)
Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/12
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), Randal L. Schwartz, 2006/04/12
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/13
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode? (was Re: perl-mode indent bug), Randal L. Schwartz, 2006/04/13
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/13
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/14
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Randal L. Schwartz, 2006/04/14
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/14
- Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/15
Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/15
Re: cperl-mode instead of perl-mode?, Piet van Oostrum, 2006/04/15