[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Click event bug? (was Re: Moving vertical...)
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: Click event bug? (was Re: Moving vertical...) |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Apr 2006 01:21:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Nick Roberts <address@hidden> writes:
> > I think this is because the click event on the vertical line returns
> the
> > column number measured from the top of the frame instead of the top of
> ^^^^^^
> I meant row number.
>
> > the window.
> >
> > Could you fix it?
>
> I'm hoping Kim will look at it.
Does this patch do what you need?
Index: window.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/src/window.c,v
retrieving revision 1.540
diff -c -r1.540 window.c
*** window.c 20 Mar 2006 22:22:25 -0000 1.540
--- window.c 16 Apr 2006 23:22:02 -0000
***************
*** 661,672 ****
|| WINDOW_RIGHTMOST_P (w))
{
if (!WINDOW_LEFTMOST_P (w) && abs (*x - x0) < grabbable_width)
! return ON_VERTICAL_BORDER;
}
else
{
if (abs (*x - x1) < grabbable_width)
! return ON_VERTICAL_BORDER;
}
if (*x < x0 || *x >= x1)
--- 661,680 ----
|| WINDOW_RIGHTMOST_P (w))
{
if (!WINDOW_LEFTMOST_P (w) && abs (*x - x0) < grabbable_width)
! {
! *x = max (0, *x - x0);
! *y -= top_y;
! return ON_VERTICAL_BORDER;
! }
}
else
{
if (abs (*x - x1) < grabbable_width)
! {
! *x = min (x1, *x) - x0;
! *y -= top_y;
! return ON_VERTICAL_BORDER;
! }
}
if (*x < x0 || *x >= x1)
***************
*** 708,714 ****
&& !WINDOW_HAS_VERTICAL_SCROLL_BAR (w)
&& !WINDOW_RIGHTMOST_P (w)
&& (abs (*x - right_x) < grabbable_width))
! return ON_VERTICAL_BORDER;
}
else
{
--- 716,726 ----
&& !WINDOW_HAS_VERTICAL_SCROLL_BAR (w)
&& !WINDOW_RIGHTMOST_P (w)
&& (abs (*x - right_x) < grabbable_width))
! {
! *x = min (right_x, *x) - left_x;
! *y -= top_y;
! return ON_VERTICAL_BORDER;
! }
}
else
{
***************
*** 720,725 ****
--- 732,739 ----
{
/* On the border on the right side of the window? Assume that
this area begins at RIGHT_X minus a canonical char width. */
+ *x = min (right_x, *x) - left_x;
+ *y -= top_y;
return ON_VERTICAL_BORDER;
}
}
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- RE: Moving vertical boundaries after C-x 3, (continued)
- Re: Moving vertical boundaries after C-x 3, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/13
- Re: Moving vertical boundaries after C-x 3, Nick Roberts, 2006/04/13
- Re: Moving vertical boundaries after C-x 3, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/13
- Click event bug? (was Re: Moving vertical...), Nick Roberts, 2006/04/13
- Click event bug? (was Re: Moving vertical...), Nick Roberts, 2006/04/13
- Re: Click event bug? (was Re: Moving vertical...), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/15
- Re: Click event bug? (was Re: Moving vertical...), Nick Roberts, 2006/04/15
- Re: Click event bug? (was Re: Moving vertical...),
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: Click event bug? (was Re: Moving vertical...), Nick Roberts, 2006/04/16
- Re: Click event bug? (was Re: Moving vertical...), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/17
- Re: Click event bug? (was Re: Moving vertical...), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/16
- Re: Moving vertical boundaries after C-x 3, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/14
- Re: Moving vertical boundaries after C-x 3, Nick Roberts, 2006/04/14
- Re: Moving vertical boundaries after C-x 3, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/15
- Re: Moving vertical boundaries after C-x 3, Nick Roberts, 2006/04/15
- Re: Moving vertical boundaries after C-x 3, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/16
- Re: Moving vertical boundaries after C-x 3, Nick Roberts, 2006/04/16
- Re: Moving vertical boundaries after C-x 3, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/17