[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:03:25 -0500 (CDT) |
Guanpeng Xu wrote:
I agree. I think it would be better if this information appears
not only in elisp manual, but also in docstring of
'max-specpdl-size' as well, if the increment cannot be avoided.
I now see that with "this information" you meant that entry to the
Lisp debugger increases the value. It would do no harm to mention
this it the docstring. However, I believe that the current docstring
already makes clear that `max-specpdl-size' is no hard limit.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, (continued)
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/17
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Miles Bader, 2006/04/17
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Miles Bader, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, David Kastrup, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/19
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/18
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?,
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/19
Re: Max-specpdl-size Bug in Emacs Lisp Interpreter?, Herbert Euler, 2006/04/18