Re: PURESIZE increased (again)

[Stefan Monnier]

>> (I imagine you already know that.)

> No, I didn't know.  And I don't know why these numbers are so low on
> my machines.  How can I investigate?  Will it cause problems?

AFAIK these low numbers have no meaning: if the pure size overflows, the
number printed is always some ridiculously low number, unrelated to the
actual size of the pure space (or more specifically: probably somehow
related, but not equal to).


        Stefan