[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: PURESIZE increased (again) |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Apr 2006 20:35:05 +0900 |
On 4/22/06, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> I think we simply
> _must_ understand why on similar systems the numbers are so different
Why? What's the _downside_ of adding a fudge factor to puresize? Is
it worth the time to debug? [On a modern system.]
It's nice to understand every detail, but sometimes it's not worth the effort.
-Miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), (continued)
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Andreas Schwab, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/28
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/29
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/29
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/29
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Andreas Schwab, 2006/04/29
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/21
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/22
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again),
Miles Bader <=
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/22
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/22
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/22
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Nick Roberts, 2006/04/22
- RE: PURESIZE increased (again), Drew Adams, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Alan Shutko, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Nick Roberts, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Bill Wohler, 2006/04/23