[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mem leak
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: mem leak |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:15:38 +0900 |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> (garbage-collect)
>
> Reclaim storage for Lisp objects no longer needed.
> Garbage collection happens automatically if you cons more than
> `gc-cons-threshold' bytes of Lisp data since previous garbage collection.
...
> However, if there was overflow in pure space, `garbage-collect'
> returns nil, because real GC can't be done.
That seems to answer my question -- when I do (garbage-collect), it
returns nil!!!!! If it's not GCing... :-O
I guess pure space overflowed when I built emacs and I didn't notice
(even with all the recent discussion :-).
Thanks,
-Miles
--
"Most attacks seem to take place at night, during a rainstorm, uphill,
where four map sheets join." -- Anon. British Officer in WW I
- mem leak, Miles Bader, 2006/04/23
- Re: mem leak, David Kastrup, 2006/04/23
- Re: mem leak,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: mem leak, LENNART BORGMAN, 2006/04/24
- Re: mem leak, Miles Bader, 2006/04/24
- Re: mem leak, Romain Francoise, 2006/04/24
- Re: mem leak, Miles Bader, 2006/04/24
- Re: mem leak, Miles Bader, 2006/04/24
- Re: mem leak, Stefan Monnier, 2006/04/24
- Re: mem leak, Miles Bader, 2006/04/24
- Re: mem leak, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/24
- memory consumption with pure-space-overflow (was: mem leak), Reiner Steib, 2006/04/26
- Re: memory consumption with pure-space-overflow (was: mem leak), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/27