[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Apr 2006 03:07:05 +0200 |
On 4/29/06, martin rudalics <address@hidden> wrote:
In "normal" mode you would have to settle on an appropriate strategy
anyway when there are more than nine subexpressions.
Yes. By definition any limit is arbitrary. However, in my limited
experience, three subexpressions is way too little. It doesn't take a
very complex regexp to go over three subexps.
On the other hand,
in sub-expression mode one face is all you need - you could use say
(face-name (format "reb-match-%d" (if subexp 1 i)))
in `reb-update-overlays'.
I like using different faces in subexpression mode...
--
/L/e/k/t/u
- Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings, (continued)
- Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings, martin rudalics, 2006/04/26
- Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/27
- Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings, martin rudalics, 2006/04/27
- Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/04/27
- Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings, Adrian Aichner, 2006/04/28
- Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/04/28
- Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/29
- Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings, Juanma Barranquero, 2006/04/29
- Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings, Adrian Aichner, 2006/04/29
- Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings, martin rudalics, 2006/04/29
- Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/29