Re: [PATCH] Unicode Lisp reader escapes

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 10:33:55 +0900
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
> 
> > I think we should treat them as much as possible consistently with the rest
> > of the treatment of unicode chars.  If we start down the path of "OK, we can
> > do it like this for those chars but not these, oh and as for those ones over
> > there, we'll do it yet some other way", I think we're headed for headaches
> > with no real benefit.
> 
> I agree.

What happens when a Lisp file is byte-compiled--do we want the result
to depend on the local settings?