Re: Omission in tutorial

[David Kastrup]

"Stuart D. Herring" <address@hidden> writes:

> PS: David: It occurs to me that my previous message was not only
> short in the literal sense but also quite easily taken to be short
> in the conversational sense.  Apologies.

I think that the people on this list have enough reading to do to be
glad for not having to skip through niceties.  We have no conventions
for marking comment matter in mail other than writing between the
lines.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum