|
From: | Kenichi Handa |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Unicode Lisp reader escapes |
Date: | Fri, 12 May 2006 14:26:47 +0900 |
User-agent: | SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes: > I don't know a convenient way to specify values of huge > char-tables and hash-tables in each file. > Obviously we find another way to specify the information. > Please try to find a solution; don't give up just because it > nontrivial. At least you now understand it's not trivial. Why do you think it's worth doing at this stage even if it requires nontrivial work? How about just asking users to use emacs-mule coding system for *.el files if they want them decoded the same way independent of various settings on byte-compiling? Such *.elc files are still loadable by emacs-unicode. --- Kenichi Handa address@hidden
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |