[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: turn-on-*-mode
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: turn-on-*-mode |
Date: |
Thu, 18 May 2006 22:03:24 -0400 |
> It would mean that there is no longer an argument you could use,
> noninteractively, to toggle the mode.
Actually there is: the symbol `toggle' does it.
Ok.
> Another drawback is simply that the interactive and noninteractive
> behavior of these commands will be different.
Not really. It just means that the argument passed to the minor mode
function in the absence of a prefix-arg won't be nil but will be `toggle'.
As a matter of fact, this is already the case.
It sounds rather clean. Would you please add it to etc/TODO?
- Re: turn-on-*-mode, (continued)
- Re: turn-on-*-mode, Johan Bockgård, 2006/05/16
- Re: turn-on-*-mode, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/16
- Re: turn-on-*-mode, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/16
- Re: turn-on-*-mode, Reiner Steib, 2006/05/30
- Re: turn-on-*-mode, Sam Steingold, 2006/05/30
- Re: turn-on-*-mode, Reiner Steib, 2006/05/30
- Re: turn-on-*-mode, Reiner Steib, 2006/05/16
- Re: turn-on-*-mode, Miles Bader, 2006/05/16
- Re: turn-on-*-mode, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/17
- Re: turn-on-*-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/17
- Re: turn-on-*-mode,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: turn-on-*-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/18
- Re: turn-on-*-mode, Kevin Rodgers, 2006/05/16
- Re: turn-on-*-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/17