[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: doc of defining minor modes
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: doc of defining minor modes |
Date: |
Fri, 19 May 2006 14:28:35 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I don't think it's worth the trouble to write a long explanation.
> It's perfectly OK to have arguments and features marked as
> "don't ever use this unless you really know what you're doing".
> It's more like "don't use this if you _know_ what you're doing and your
> library is exceptional" (large, complex, coupled with other libraries,
> preloaded,...).
You seem to want to document the technical problems that may come up.
I have no interest in doing that. All I know is that it tends to create
problems so we discourage minor modes that are enabled by default.
If you can come up with a good reason why it may be *useful* (as opposed to
harmless) to have a minor mode enabled by default, please enlighten us.
Stefan
- RE: doc of defining minor modes, (continued)
- RE: doc of defining minor modes, Drew Adams, 2006/05/19
- Re: doc of defining minor modes, David Kastrup, 2006/05/19
- RE: doc of defining minor modes, Drew Adams, 2006/05/19
- Re: doc of defining minor modes, Andreas Schwab, 2006/05/19
- Re: doc of defining minor modes, Stefan Monnier, 2006/05/19
- RE: doc of defining minor modes, Drew Adams, 2006/05/19
- Re: doc of defining minor modes, David Kastrup, 2006/05/19
- Re: doc of defining minor modes,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: doc of defining minor modes, Miles Bader, 2006/05/18
Re: doc of defining minor modes, David Kastrup, 2006/05/18
Re: doc of defining minor modes, Richard Stallman, 2006/05/18